SEC Says Residents Are Seeing Through the Sizzle and Spin

After a packed public meeting on the 'Leaf Development'

Related articles:

Chance to see the latest plans for the Arcadia centre

If The Developers Had Something To Say About The Watchdog Report...

Developers Say They Welcome CABE Constructive Criticism

Ask Arcadia

What does the future hold for Ealing Broadway

Arcadia - disaster looming or big business in the making

Participate

For more information on Save Ealing’s Centre visit:

www.saveealingscentre.com

or contact Martyn Grogan at mail@saveealingscentre.com 

 

www.saveealingscentre.com

For further information on the Glenkerrin development visit www.ealingleaf.co.uk

Details of the planning application are available to view at the Council’s Perceval House offices, Uxbridge Road, Ealing or online and in borough libraries. 

The Council is keen to hear the views of people who live in, work in or shop in the borough as the centre of Ealing is important to the whole community. The planning application will be considered by the Council in early 2008.

info@ecplondon.co.uk

www.ealingcentrepartnership.co.uk

Have your say on the EalingToday forum

Save Ealing's Centre (SEC) has branded the 'Leaf Development' application 'profiteering at the expense of the public realm', following a packed public meeting at which Sean O'Gorman of developers Glenkerrin spoke.

The packed meeting saw more than 50 turned away as Ealing residents filed in to hear more about the centre's future. A good turn out had been expected, but more than 350 attendees have given SEC what they see as a 'clear mandate to continue pressing Council and Glenkerrin'.

Speaking after the meeting, Chairman of SEC, Nick Woolven remained resolute: "The recent public meeting ...was proof enough that Ealing residents see through the sizzle and spin that Glenkerrin are peddling.

"Yes, Ealing needs regeneration and development, but under the covers this proposal will not give Ealing anything it really needs for the next generation to inherit, save a dense overdevelopment dominated by a wholly inappropriate mega-block."

Mr Woolven questioned the developers' town planning credentials: "Glenkerrin clearly fancy themselves as doing the Council's job, announcing their role as 'leading the strategic redevelopment in Ealing'. Whoever heard of a commercial organisation adopting such a philanthropic approach?"

SEC told EalingToday they consider the application premature in light of the CABE (industry watchdog) report findings and also called for the developers to take into account an imminent Tibbald report.

"This should help the Council overcome its lack of a current Town Centre development strategy, its policy for tall buildings, its integrated policy for transportation and its policy for appropriate levels of affordable housing.

"All these policies need to be in place before any decision can be even considered and I would urge residents to write to the Council before the 14th December to make their views clear. Ealing deserves better!"

December 5, 2007